Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMedOpen access

Autologous fat grafting for postoperative breast reconstruction: A systemic review.

Yu W., Wang Z., Dai Y., Zhao S., Chen H., Wang S.

Narrative Review on Systemic / IV, published in Regen Ther (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Ther (2024)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39553540
PMCID
PMC11564784
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2024.10.007
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Autologous fat grafting technology has become a new method for breast reconstruction after breast surgery due to its advantages of simple operation, low immunogenicity, fewer complications, high patient acceptance, and natural filling effect. However, the unpredictable fate of transplanted fat limits its widespread application. Currently, many studies have made certain progress in improving the survival rate of fat grafts. This article provides an overview of autologous fat grafting technology, including the mechanisms of fat graft survival, techniques for obtaining and transplanting adipose tissue, methods for enhancing graft survival, and complications associated with fat grafting.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research