Autologous fat transplantation for secondary breast reconstruction: our experience
Simonacci F., Grieco MP., Bertozzi N., Raposio E.
Prospective Study with a reported sample of 4, published in G Chir (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- G Chir (2017)
- Reported sample size
- 4
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 29205140
- PMCID
- PMC5726497
- DOI
- 10.11138/gchir/2017.38.3.117
- Citations
- 7
Abstract (original English)
Background Autologous fat transplantation is used after breast reconstruction to improve the breast profile. There are a variety of different methods used for fat harvesting, preparation, and reinjection. This study describes the specific techniques we used in this series of autologous fat transplantations in breast reconstruction patients and reports their outcomes compared with other studies in the literature. Patients and methods At the University Hospital of Parma between May 2012 and December 2016, we performed 53 autologous fat transplantations for secondary breast reconstruction patients with an average age of 49 years (range: 34-65 y). A tumescent fluid (NaCl, epinephrine, and a local anaesthetic) was injected, and the lipoaspirate was harvested using a closed aspiration-injection system connected to a 50 ml syringe, a 4 mm infiltration cannula, and a -650 mmHg vacuum. The average amount of lipoaspirate obtained was 100 ml (range: 50-200 ml). Centrifugation of the lipoaspirate (3000 rpm for 3 min) was performed to isolate the adipose tissue (average amount obtained, 80 ml; range: 30-180 ml). Under local anaesthesia, the retrograde injection of thin layers of fat graft in multiple tunnels was performed in the subcutaneous and/or subglandular planes. Results Average follow-up was six months. Comparable to other studies, our complication rate was 7.4% (n = 4/53) and includ
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.