Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Autologous fibroblast therapy for facial rejuvenation: A randomized open-label controlled study

Gentile P.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 20 on Skin Aging, Facial Rejuvenation, published in JPRAS Open (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
JPRAS Open (2026)
Reported sample size
20
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42339013
PMCID
PMC13285675
DOI
10.1016/j.jpra.2026.05.045

Abstract (original English)

Background The aging process of the face is characterized by dermal thinning, loss of elasticity, and wrinkle formation. Injection of autologous micrografts containing fibroblasts (Am-FBs) has emerged as a promising regenerative technique. Objectives This trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Am-FBs for facial rejuvenation. Methods A randomized, open-label, controlled study was conducted. Forty patients presenting with mild to moderate dermal thinning, reduced elasticity, and wrinkles were divided into two groups: a study group (SG; n = 20) that received Am-FBs treatment and a control group (CG; n = 20) treated with a hyaluronic acid (HA)-based skin booster. Both groups received treatment at baseline (T0), at one month (T1), and at three months (T2). Clinical outcomes were evaluated at T1, T2, T3 (6 months), and T4 (12 months) through patient and physician evaluations, the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), and objective skin elasticity metrics. In vitro evaluation of the Am-FBs and immunophenotypic characterization of the nucleated cell population contained in the Am-FBs suspension was performed. Results At T4, the SG showed significantly greater improvements in wrinkle depth, skin elasticity, and WSRS score than the CG ( p p = 0.049), whereas patient self-assessments ranged from 9 to 5 ( p = 0.039). Patient satisfaction was higher in the SG. The in vitro analysis

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research