Bibliometric and visualized analysis of scientific publications on rehabilitation of rotator cuff injury based on web of science
Hu Y., Wu L., He L., Luo X., Hu L., Wang Y.
Laboratory Study on Rotator Cuff, published in Front Public Health (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Front Public Health (2023)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 36875410
- PMCID
- PMC9982153
- DOI
- 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1064576
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Background Since the discovery of rehabilitation as an intervention for rotator cuff injury, its impact on the recovery of rotator cuff injury has attracted crucial attention, and the number of related studies is increasing worldwide. There were no bibliometric and visualized analysis studies in this field. This study aimed to investigate the research hotpots and trends in the rehabilitation of rotator cuff injury via bibliometric and visualized analysis and to identify the future development of clinical practice. Method The publications regarding rehabilitation of rotator cuff injury from inception to December 2021 were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The trends of publications, co-authorship and co-occurrence analysis and visualized analysis were carried out using Citespace, VOSviewer, Scimago Graphica software, and R Project. Results A total of 795 publications were included in this study. The number of publications significantly increased yearly. The United States published the highest number of related papers and the papers published by the United States had the highest citations. The University of Laval, the University of Montreal and Keele University were the top 3 most contributive institutions. Additionally, the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery was the journal with the highest number of publications. The most common keywords were "rotato
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparing Regenerative Biologics and Standard Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Study of PRP, Cell-Based, and Peptide Interventions
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Orthop Sports Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Orthop Sports Med - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Surgical vs. non-surgical therapy for partial tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled studies with indirect comparison
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 818 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 818
BMC Musculoskelet Disord - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Comparison of nonsurgical treatment approaches for partial rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 137 on Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in JSES Rev Rep Tech (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 137
JSES Rev Rep Tech - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
The role of injections of mesenchymal stem cells as an augmentation tool in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in JSES Rev Rep Tech (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 5
JSES Rev Rep Tech - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Poor consideration of tissue loading in randomised trials of MSC interventions for tendon pathology: A systematic review using the TIDieR framework.
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in J Exp Orthop (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
J Exp Orthop - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Combined arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with mesenchymal stem cell augmentation shows similar functional outcomes but a higher structural integrity rate compared with isolated repair: a meta-analysis of comparative stu
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 415 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in JSES Int (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 415
JSES Int