Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Bioengineered Approaches for Esophageal Regeneration: Advancing Esophageal Cancer Therapy

Kim JS., Nam H., Kim EC., Jeong HJ., Lee SJ.

Narrative Review, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Bioengineering (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40428100
PMCID
PMC12109178
DOI
10.3390/bioengineering12050479
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis and aggressive progression. Esophagectomy remains the primary treatment, typically requiring organ-based reconstruction techniques such as gastric pull-up or colonic interposition. However, these reconstruction methods often lead to severe complications, significantly reducing the quality of life of patients. To address these limitations, tissue engineering has emerged as a promising alternative, offering bioengineered patch-type and tubular-type scaffolds designed to restore both structural integrity and functional regeneration. Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) biofabrication-including 3D bioprinting, electrospinning, and other cutting-edge techniques-have facilitated the development of patient-specific constructs with improved biocompatibility. Despite significant advancements, critical challenges persist in achieving mechanical durability, multilayered cellular organization, and physiological resilience post-transplantation. Ongoing research continues to address these limitations and enhance clinical applicability. Therefore, this review aims to examine recent advancements in esophageal tissue engineering, with a focus on key biofabrication techniques, preclinical animal models, and the major translational challenges that must be addresse

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.