Biological Augmentation of Meniscal Repair: A Review with Insights into Injectable Hydrogel Delivery
Tuszynska M., Skopinska-Wisniewska J., Bajek A.
Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, published in Gels (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Gels (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41149391
- PMCID
- PMC12562484
- DOI
- 10.3390/gels11100786
Abstract (original English)
Meniscal injuries are common and often lead to chronic pain, joint instability, and an increased risk of osteoarthritis. Traditional treatments, such as partial meniscectomy, may accelerate joint degeneration. In recent years, biologically active therapies, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hyaluronic acid (HA), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), collagen, growth factors (GFs), and silk fibroin (SF), have emerged as promising strategies to enhance meniscal healing. This review evaluates the efficiency of these biological agents in promoting meniscal repair, with a particular focus on their potential integration into injectable hydrogel systems for targeted, minimally invasive delivery. Recent literature from 2015 to 2025 has provided growing insights into the role of biologically active agents and biomaterials in meniscal repair. Among the agents studied, PRP, MSCs, and HA have shown particular promise in modulating inflammation and supporting tissue regeneration. While biological therapies alone may not replace surgery for complex tears, they offer promising, less invasive alternatives that support tissue preservation. However, variability in study design, agent quality, and treatment protocols remains challenging. Further long-term research will be essential to confirm clinical benefits and optimize hydrogel-based delivery methods.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Optimizing Meniscus Allograft Transplantation - Reducing Extrusion and Restoring Joint Loading Mechanics: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, published in Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Clinical Outcomes of Biologic Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With ≥12-Month Follow-up.
Meta-analysis on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Mod Rheumatol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Mod Rheumatol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Towards optimized rehabilitation with regenerative therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of cell-based injections for knee osteoarthritis
Meta-analysis on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular fat grafting for pain relief and functioning improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis: systematic review.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Disabil Rehabil (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Disabil Rehabil - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Research Landscape of Stem Cell Applications in Musculoskeletal Tissue: A Scoping Review.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Cells (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cells