Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMedOpen access

From Biological Waste to Therapeutic Resources: A Comprehensive Review of Stem Cell Sources, Characterization, and Biomedical Potentials.

Camia B., Monti M.

Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, Cardiovascular Disease, Scar, Autoimmune Research, published in Stem Cell Rev Rep (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Stem Cell Rev Rep (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41091433
PMCID
PMC12795948
DOI
10.1007/s12015-025-10989-3
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

The concept of utilizing biological waste as a resource dates back centuries, with early practices in traditional medicine repurposing discarded tissues for healing purposes. In recent decades, advances in stem cell biology have revitalized this concept by identifying multipotent stem cells within various waste materials, including urine, adipose tissue, follicular fluid, umbilical cord blood, fetal annexes, menstrual blood, and dental pulp byproducts. These sources offer a minimally invasive, ethically sound, and cost-effective alternative to conventional stem cell harvesting methods. Stem cells derived from waste materials exhibit robust proliferative abilities and multilineage differentiation potential, positioning them as valuable tools for regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and personalized therapeutic applications. Clinical studies highlight their promise. For example, mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue and umbilical cord blood have shown safety and some effectiveness in early trials. These studies report improvements of up to 30-40% in recovery scores for osteoarthritis and ischemic heart disease, as well as a 20-35% decrease in inflammatory markers for autoimmune disorders. Cord blood stem cell transplants have shown 70-90% survival rates in children with blood cancers. This underscores the clinical potential of waste-derived stem cells. However, regulat

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansRegenerative MedicineStem CellsAnimalsStem Cell TransplantationTissue Engineering

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research