Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Biomaterial-Based Regenerative Strategies for Volumetric Muscle Loss: Challenges and Solutions

Cai CW., Grey JA., Hubmacher D., Han WM.

Narrative Review, published in Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
38775429
PMCID
PMC11971559
DOI
10.1089/wound.2024.0079
Citations
11

Abstract (original English)

Significance: Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is caused by the loss of significant amounts of skeletal muscle tissue. VML cannot be repaired by intrinsic regenerative processes, resulting in permanent loss of muscle function and disability. Current rehabilitative-focused treatment strategies lack efficacy and do not restore muscle function, indicating the need for the development of effective regenerative strategies. Recent Advances: Recent developments implicate biomaterial-based approaches for promoting muscle repair and functional restoration post-VML. Specifically, bioscaffolds transplanted in the injury site have been utilized to mimic endogenous cues of the ablated tissue to promote myogenic pathways, increase neo-myofiber synthesis, and ultimately restore contractile function to the injured unit. Critical Issues: Despite the development and preclinical testing of various biomaterial-based regenerative strategies, effective therapies for patients are not available. The unique challenges posed for biomaterial-based treatments of VML injuries, including its scalability and clinical applicability beyond small-animal models, impede progress. Furthermore, production of tissue-engineered constructs is technically demanding, with reproducibility issues at scale and complexities in achieving vascularization and innervation of large constructs. Future Directions: Biomaterial-based re

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Muscle, SkeletalAnimalsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsTissue EngineeringRegenerationTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.