Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Biomaterials-based approaches to mandibular tissue engineering: where we were, where we are, where we are going

Kennedy MM., Mikos AG.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Regen Biomater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Biomater (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40309352
PMCID
PMC12041422
DOI
10.1093/rb/rbaf024
Citations
7

Abstract (original English)

The mandible is the largest craniofacial bone and plays a crucial role in speech, mastication, swallowing, and facial aesthetics. The form or function of the mandible can be altered by defects as a result of tumors, trauma, infection, and congenital conditions. This paper covers the evolution of biomaterials-based approaches to the reconstruction of critical size mandibular defects. Historically the gold standard for critical size mandibular defect repair has been autologous fibula grafts. The emergence of the field of tissue engineering has led to the current research on biomaterial scaffolds, cells, and biological factors to design highly tunable, bio-inspired, tissue regenerative implants. Scaffold materials can be synthetic or natural and can be fabricated using a variety of additive manufacturing techniques. Mesenchymal stem cells, bone morphogenetic proteins, and transforming growth factor-β are frequently added to scaffolds. While great progress has been made, there are still barriers to translating this research to patients, ranging from insufficient bone regeneration in animal studies to the feasibility of establishing a good manufacturing practice. To address these challenges, the future of mandibular tissue engineering will look toward improving implant vascularization and innervation, personalizing implant shape and biology, and enhancing spatiotemporal control of d

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research