Biomechanics of Negative-Pressure-Assisted Liposuction and Their Influence on Fat Regeneration.
Qin Z., Chen G., Wang N., Long J., Yang M., Wang J.
Narrative Review, published in Tissue Eng Part B Rev (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Tissue Eng Part B Rev (2024)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 39587950
- DOI
- 10.1089/ten.teb.2024.0186
Abstract (original English)
Autologous fat grafting has been widely adopted in cosmetic and reconstructive procedures recently. With the emerging of negative-pressure-assisted liposuction system, the harvesting process of fat grafting is more standardized, controllable, and efficient. Each component in the system could influence the biomechanical environment of lipoaspirate. Several reviews have studied the impact of negative pressure on fat regeneration. As the initial part of the harvesting system, cannulas possess their unique mechanical parameters and their influence on lipoaspirate biomechanical characters, biological behaviors, and regeneration patterns remains unclear. Basic in vivo and in vitro studies have been performed to determine the possible mechanisms. Instant in vivo studies focus on adipocytes, stromal vascular fraction cells, fat particles, and growth factors, while in vivo grafting experiments analyze the graft retention rate and histology. Understanding the different regeneration patterns of lipoaspirate and the mechanisms behind may facilitate the choice of harvesting cannulas in clinical practice.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.