Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Biomimetic multilayered hydrogel scaffold with dual cell types and mesh support for urethral reconstruction.

Grybas A., Povilas B., Dasevicius D., Andrius B., Zilinskaite-Tamasauske R., Baltrukonyte E.

Laboratory Study on Systemic / IV, published in Biofabrication (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Biofabrication (2026)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
42546766
DOI
10.1088/1758-5090/ae9400

Abstract (original English)

Urethral strictures and hypospadias remain major challenges in urology, with current treatments limited by donorsite morbidity, graft shrinkage, and poor long-term outcomes. To address these limitations, we developed a biomimetic multilayered hydrogel scaffold with dual cell types and mesh reinforcement for urethral reconstruction. The construct combined predifferentiated buccal mucosa cells and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells within a gelatin methacrylate-silk fibroin (GelMA-SF) hydrogel supported by electrowritten and electrospun polymeric meshes, designed to reproduce both epithelial and smooth muscle layers of the native urethra. Implanted into the rabbit urethra and followed for 12 weeks, the scaffold showed favorable integration with early but transient immune activation, preservation of systemic stability, and maintenance of urethral lumen architecture. Histological evaluation revealed the formation of a stratified urothelium and organized smooth muscle bundles with limited fibrosis, highlighting the scaffold's potential to support functional urethral regeneration and serve as an alternative to graft-based urethroplasty.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research