Biomimetic Strategies for Bone Regeneration: Smart Scaffolds and Multiscale Cues
Hossen SMM., Khaleque MA., Lim MS., Kang JK., Kim DK., Lee HH.
Narrative Review, published in Biomimetics (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Biomimetics (Basel) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41589929
- PMCID
- PMC12838871
- DOI
- 10.3390/biomimetics11010012
- Citations
- 3
Abstract (original English)
Bone regeneration remains difficult due to the complex bone microenvironment and the limited healing capacity of large defects. Biomimetic strategies offer promising solutions by using advanced 3D scaffolds guided by natural tissue cues. Recent advances in additive manufacturing, nanotechnology, and tissue engineering now allow the fabrication of hierarchical scaffolds that closely mimic native bone. Smart scaffold systems combine materials with biochemical and mechanical signals. These features improve vascularization, enhance tissue integration, and support better regenerative outcomes. Bio-inspired materials also help connect inert implants with living tissues by promoting vascular network formation and improving cell communication. Multiscale design approaches recreate bone nano- to macro-level structure and support both osteogenic activity and immune regulation. Intelligent and adaptive scaffolds are being developed to respond to physiological changes and enable personalized bone repair. This review discusses the current landscape of biomimetic scaffold design, fabrication techniques, material strategies, biological mechanisms, and translational considerations shaping next-generation bone regeneration technologies. Future directions focus on sustainable, clinically translatable biomimetic systems that can integrate with digital health tools for improved treatment planning.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.