Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Biophysical signal-driven scaffold design for stem cell-guided osteochondral regeneration

Gao Y., Zhuang Y., Zhu T., Zhang H., Wang Y., Chang F.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Bioact Mater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Bioact Mater (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41743835
PMCID
PMC12930055
DOI
10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.12.021
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Osteochondral tissue comprises two structurally and functionally distinct regions: An avascular, low-cellularity cartilage layer with poor self-healing capacity, and a vascularized, mineralized subchondral bone. This pronounced heterogeneity complicates the repair of defects that span both regions. Conventional clinical treatments, such as microfracture and autologous chondrocyte implantation, often fail to restore the native biphasic architecture, leading to disorganized fibrocartilage and poor tissue integration. Tissue engineering has emerged as a promising strategy by integrating mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with engineered biomaterial scaffolds. However, spatially directing MSCs toward chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages remains challenging. Beyond biochemical cues, biophysical cues play pivotal roles in modulating MSC fate via integrin-mediated mechanotransduction, cytoskeletal remodeling, and mechanosignaling pathways, including TRPV4, Piezo1, and YAP/TAZ. When appropriately encoded within scaffolds, these biophysical cues provide sustained, spatially defined guidance to MSCs. This review summarizes recent advances in scaffold design that leverage mechanobiology to construct biomimetic microenvironments, thereby manipulating lineage-specific MSC differentiation and facilitating layered, stratified osteochondral regeneration.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research