Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Bone marrow aspirate injection for osteoarthritis of the hip; A pilot study

Tsitsilianos N., Shirazi Z., Lu J., Singh JR.

Retrospective Study on Osteoarthritis, Hip Osteoarthritis, published in Interv Pain Med (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Interv Pain Med (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39238872
PMCID
PMC11372984
DOI
10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100163
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Objectives Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) intra-articular injection is a minimally invasive orthobiologic treatment option for osteoarthritis (OA). Hip OA affects a significant portion of the population and has a paucity of data surrounding orthobiologic treatments. The primary objective of this study was to delineate the clinical impact of bone marrow aspirate intra-articular injections on decreasing pain and improving function in patients with hip OA. Methods A single-center, retrospective analysis of thirty-one patients, aged 32 to 83 (62.4 ​± ​16.5), with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) Hip OA grading of 2-4 (mean 2.9 ​± ​0.7), who underwent intra-articular bone marrow aspirate injection into the hip and were followed for twelve months. Evaluation was at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr (HOOS-Jr) for function. The proportion of responders, as defined by a ≥50% reduction in NRS pain score, was assessed at 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Results At 6 and 12 months follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in NRS scores (P ​ Conclusion In patient with mild, moderate, and severe hip OA, BMA may be an alternative treatment that improves pain and function in patients for as long as 12 months. In addition, BMA may also be an effective, lower cost option to

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research