Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Breast Implant and Fat Grafting With Radial Scoring for Tuberous Breast Deformity With Lower Pole Constriction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Ruiz-Castilla M., Dos-Santos BP., Yuste M.

Retrospective Study, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40861504
PMCID
PMC12373092
DOI
10.1097/gox.0000000000007045

Abstract (original English)

Background Diverse surgical techniques can be used to correct tuberous breast deformity (TBD). This study aimed to analyze lower pole expansion using breast implants and fat grafting with radial scoring for TBD correction. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent TBD surgery between 2018 and 2022. All patients in whom a breast implant was used were included. Two groups were considered according to the use of fat grafting. Patients and surgeons assessed aesthetic outcomes at follow-up using the Aesthetic Items Scale. Results Sixty-two patients (median age of 30 y) were included in the study. Fat grafting was performed in 42 (67.7%) patients, and the volume of fat used was 65 (35 -120) mL. No significant differences existed in radial scoring use (16 [80.0%] versus 35 [83.3%]) between the groups. In the fat grafting group, the Aesthetic Items Scale improved in shape, volume, symmetry, and total score. No patients reported altered sensitivity, and only 1 (1.6%) required revision surgery. Conclusions Combining diverse surgical techniques (implants, fat grafting, radial scoring) was associated with good aesthetic outcomes in TBD correction. This approach may be considered a feasible surgical approach for TBD.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.