Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Calcium-phosphate ceramics and polysaccharide-based hydrogel scaffolds combined with mesenchymal stem cell differently support bone repair in rats

Frasca S., Norol F., Le Visage C., Collombet JM., Letourneur D., Holy X.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in J Mater Sci Mater Med (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Mater Sci Mater Med (2017)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
28110459
PMCID
PMC5253158
DOI
10.1007/s10856-016-5839-6
Citations
34

Abstract (original English)

Research in bone tissue engineering is focused on the development of alternatives to autologous bone grafts for bone reconstruction. Although multiple stem cell-based products and biomaterials are currently being investigated, comparative studies are rarely achieved to evaluate the most appropriate approach in this context. Here, we aimed to compare different clinically relevant bone tissue engineering methods and evaluated the kinetic repair and the bone healing efficiency supported by mesenchymal stem cells and two different biomaterials, a new hydrogel scaffold and a commercial hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate ceramic, alone or in combination.Syngeneic mesenchymal stem cells (5 × 10 5 ) and macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic granules (Calciresorb C35 ® , Ceraver) or porous pullulan/dextran-based hydrogel scaffold were implanted alone or combined in a drilled-hole bone defect in rats. Using quantitative microtomography measurements and qualitative histological examinations, their osteogenic properties were evaluated 7, 30, and 90 days after implantation. Three months after surgery, only minimal repair was evidenced in control rats while newly mineralized bone was massively observed in animals treated with either hydrogels (bone volume/tissue volume = 20%) or ceramics (bone volume/tissue volume = 26%). Repair mechanism and resorption kinetics were strikingly dif

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
FemurBone Marrow CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsRats, Inbred LewRatsBone ResorptionNeovascularization, PathologicCalcium PhosphatesPolysaccharides

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research