Cancer-derived extracellular vesicles: the 'soil conditioner' in breast cancer metastasis?
Chin AR., Wang SE.
Narrative Review, published in Cancer Metastasis Rev (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Cancer Metastasis Rev (2016)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 27838868
- PMCID
- PMC5831362
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10555-016-9639-8
- Citations
- 49
Abstract (original English)
It has been recognized that cancer-associated mortality is more often a result of the disrupted physiological functions in multiple organs following metastatic dissemination of cancer cells, rather than the presence and growth of the primary tumor. Despite advances in our understanding of the events leading to cancer initiation, growth, and acquisition of invasive properties, we are still unable to effectively treat metastatic disease. It is now being accepted that the secretion of extracellular vesicles, such as exosomes from cancer cells, has a profound impact on the initiation and propagation of metastatic breast cancer. These cancer-secreted vesicles differ from other means of cellular communication due to their capability of bulk delivery and organotropism. Here, we provide an overview of the role of extracellular vesicles in breast cancer metastasis and discuss key areas that may facilitate our understanding of metastatic breast cancer to guide our efforts towards providing better therapies.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.