Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

[Capabilities of digital microfocal x-ray study in the evaluation of reparative regeneration of bone tissue in an experiment].

Vasil'ev AIu., Bulanova IM., Mal'ginov NN., Kiseleva EV., Cherniaev SE., Nikulina OM.

Animal Study, published in Vestn Rentgenol Radiol (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol (2008)
Country
Russia (Federation)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
21337759

Abstract (original English)

Digital microfocal x-ray study was experimentally studied in animals to examine the time course of changes in their bone regeneration. Sixteen Chinchila rabbits whose bone defect in the angle of the mandibular ramus had been closed with the osteoplastic material Gapcol with the applied allogeneic, autologous stem cells isolated from rabbit adipose tissue and human plasma enriched with thrombocytic growth factors were examined. The capabilities of digital microfocal x-ray study versus x-ray computed tomography were compared in the evaluation of reparative regeneration of bone tissue. The results of radiation studies were verified with the data of scanning electron microscopy.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBone RegenerationBone and BonesHumansRabbitsRadiographic Image EnhancementTomography, X-Ray Computed

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.