Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesPubMed

Case Report: Intravenous transplantation of autologous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells attenuated atopic dermatitis.

Mabuchi K., Takahashi Y., Okinaka Y., Nagase K., Kataoka Y., Taguchi A.

Case Report / Series on Systemic / IV, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Front Med (Lausanne) (2026)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
42158121
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2026.1831398

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) transplantation had been shown to have a potential for reducing chronic pain. MSC transplantation suppresses excessive inflammation, and one of the potential mechanisms of action is a gap junction-meditated reduction of vascular permeability. Herein, we present the case of a 32-year-old female patient who underwent autologous adipose tissue-derived MSC transplantation for chronic pain and showed significant improvement in comorbid atopic dermatitis. Moreover, asthma attacks disappeared after MSC transplantation. This case shows that MSC therapy could be effective for treating allergic diseases, at least in responders. These findings encourage future studies to identify responders, surrogate markers, and the detailed therapeutic mechanisms of MSC transplantation for allergic diseases.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research