Cell based therapies for ischemic stroke: from basic science to bedside
Liu X., Ye R., Yan T., Yu SP., Wei L., Xu G.
Narrative Review on Stroke Research, published in Prog Neurobiol (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Prog Neurobiol (2014)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 24333397
- PMCID
- PMC4038267
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.007
- Citations
- 138
Abstract (original English)
Cell therapy is emerging as a viable therapy to restore neurological function after stroke. Many types of stem/progenitor cells from different sources have been explored for their feasibility and efficacy for the treatment of stroke. Transplanted cells not only have the potential to replace the lost circuitry, but also produce growth and trophic factors, or stimulate the release of such factors from host brain cells, thereby enhancing endogenous brain repair processes. Although stem/progenitor cells have shown a promising role in ischemic stroke in experimental studies as well as initial clinical pilot studies, cellular therapy is still at an early stage in humans. Many critical issues need to be addressed including the therapeutic time window, cell type selection, delivery route, and in vivo monitoring of their migration pattern. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive synopsis of preclinical evidence and clinical experience of various donor cell types, their restorative mechanisms, delivery routes, imaging strategies, future prospects and challenges for translating cell therapies as a neurorestorative regimen in clinical applications.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: neuroimaging approaches and evidence from a systematic review
Meta-analysis on Stroke Research, published in Front Neurol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Neurol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 3345 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Syst Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 3345
Syst Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Stem Cells Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Curr Cardiol Rev (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Curr Cardiol Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in Animal Models: A Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis on Stroke Research, published in CNS Neurosci Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
CNS Neurosci Ther5 citations - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 1184 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 1184
Stem Cell Res Ther2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
In vitro and In vivo Studies on Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Ischemic Stroke Therapy: A Scoping Review of The Therapeutic Effect
Systematic Review on Stroke Research, published in Stem Cells Cloning (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Stem Cells Cloning