Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialPubMedOpen access

Cell-Based Therapies for Rotator Cuff Injuries: An Updated Review of the Literature.

Hooper N., Marathe A., Jain NB., Jayaram P.

Randomized Controlled Trial on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in Int J Mol Sci (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2024)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38542113
PMCID
PMC10970404
DOI
10.3390/ijms25063139
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

This review focuses on non-surgical treatment options for rotator cuff injuries and highlights the potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as a potential regenerative approach. MSCs, sourced from various tissues like bone marrow and adipose tissue, exhibit promising mechanisms in vitro, influencing tendon-related gene expression and microenvironment modulation. Animal studies support this, showcasing MSCs' ability to reduce inflammation, improve tissue remodeling, and enhance repaired tendon strength. Human trials, while varied and limited, suggest that MSCs might lower retear rates and enhance post-repair outcomes, but randomized controlled trials yield mixed results, emphasizing the necessity for standardized investigations. Ultimately, while cell-based therapies demonstrate an excellent safety profile, more rigorous clinical trials are necessary to determine their efficacy in improving patient outcomes and achieving lasting structural changes in rotator cuff injuries.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansRotator Cuff InjuriesRotator CuffTendonsPlastic Surgery ProceduresCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyTreatment Outcome

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research