Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceMeta-analysisEurope PMCOpen access

Cell-derived exosome therapy for diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a preclinical animal studies systematic review and meta-analysis

Lu X., Xu R., Dong X., Bai D., Ji W., Chen X.

Meta-analysis, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Meta-analysis
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40490808
PMCID
PMC12150502
DOI
10.1186/s13287-025-04432-0
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Backgrounds Exosomes is a promising cell-free therapy for Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) that imposes long-term negative effects on patients' finances, mental health, and quality of life. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the therapeutic effects of exosomes (such as SCs-derived, FCs-derived, BMSCs-derived, MSCs-derived, and Plasma-derived) on DPN. Methods We searched nine databases from inception to February 2025, then two researchers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies using SYRCLE's tool. The outcome indicators consisted of at least one of the three key DPN endpoints (electrophysiology, behavioural assessment, and nerve structure) based on the Neurodiab guidelines. R 4.4.2 software was used to conduct all statistical analyses. Results 11 studies were identified, and the risk of bias in most studies was unclear generally. Pooled analyses demonstrated that exosome improved the nerve conduction velocity [MCV (SMD = 4.71 [2.18;7.25], P = 0.0003; I²= 91.8%), SCV (SMD = 1.07 [0.30;1.85], P = 0.0069; I²= 85.3%)], may restore IENFD [SMD = 1.46 [-0.85; 3.77], P = 0.2164; I²=88.7%], alleviated neuropathic pain [mechanical allodynia (SMD= -0.27 [-1.02;0.47], P = 0.4697; I 2 = 85.0%), thermal hyperalgesia (SMD= -1.48 [-2.45;-0.50], P = 0.003; I 2 = 88.4%)], ameliorated vascular function [blood flow perfusion in plantar (

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansDiabetic NeuropathiesExosomes

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.