Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Cell specific differences between human adipose-derived and mesenchymal-stromal cells despite similar differentiation potentials.

Noël D., Caton D., Roche S., Bony C., Lehmann S., Casteilla L.

Animal Study on Knee, published in Exp Cell Res (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Exp Cell Res (2008)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
18325494
DOI
10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.12.022
Citations
230

Abstract (original English)

Stromal cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue are attractive sources of adult progenitors for cell-based therapy. However, whether those cell populations represent intrinsically different cell types is still largely under debate. The aim of this study was to systematically and quantitatively compare adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSC) and bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal-stromal cells (BM-MSC). The quantitative comparison was realized using Taqman Low Density Array, 2D electrophoresis and differentiation functional assays in vitro. Furthermore, cells engineered to express TGFbeta1 were injected into the intra-articular space of mouse knee joints in order to determine whether they were able to form new differentiated tissues in vivo. Our data revealed cell specific differences at transcriptional and proteomic levels between both cell types according to their tissue origin as well as functional differences in their differentiation processes towards adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic programs. Nevertheless, in vitro as well as in vivo ADSC displayed the same ability than MSC to differentiate towards chondrocytes/osteoblasts, comforting the status of both cell sources as promising regenerative cells. In summary, our observations indicate that ADSC and MSC are fundamentally different cell types and differently committed cells.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipogenesisAdipose TissueAdultAnimalsCell DifferentiationChondrogenesisGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunophenotypingMesenchymal Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research