Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Cell Therapy by Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Versus Myoblasts in a Pig Model of Urinary Incontinence.

Knoll J., Amend B., Harland N., Isser S., Bézière N., Kraushaar U.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 6, published in Tissue Eng Part A (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Tissue Eng Part A (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
6
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37933911
DOI
10.1089/ten.TEA.2023.0103

Abstract (original English)

The leading cause of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women is the urethral sphincter muscle deficiency caused by mechanical stress during pregnancy and vaginal delivery. In men, prostate cancer surgery and injury of local nerves and muscles are associated with incontinence. Current treatment often fails to satisfy the patient's needs. Cell therapy may improve the situation. We therefore investigated the regeneration potential of cells in ameliorating sphincter muscle deficiency and UI in a large animal model. Urethral sphincter deficiency was induced surgically in gilts by electrocautery and balloon dilatation. Adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) and myoblasts from Musculus semitendinosus were isolated from male littermates, expanded, characterized in depth for expression of marker genes and in vitro differentiation, and labeled. The cells were injected into the deficient sphincter complex of the incontinent female littermates. Incontinent gilts receiving no cell therapy served as controls. Sphincter deficiency and functional regeneration were recorded by monitoring the urethral wall pressure during follow-up by two independent methods. Cells injected were detected in vivo during follow-up by transurethral fluorimetry, ex vivo by fluorescence imaging, and in cryosections of tissues targeted by immunofluorescence and by polymerase chain reaction of the sex-determin

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
PregnancySwineFemaleHumansMaleAnimalsUrinary IncontinenceMyoblastsMesenchymal Stem CellsUrethra

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.