Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives from Clinical Studies-A Systematic Review

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), characterised by inflammation, demyelination, and progressive neurodegeneration. Although current disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce relapse rates and inflammatory activity, they rarely stop long-term progression or repair neurological damage. In recent years, cell-based therapies have emerged as promising approaches to promote immune regulation and neuroregeneration in MS. Methods: This review summarises the current clinical evidence from studies in humans investigating cell-based treatments for MS, including autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and neural stem or progenitor cells (NSCs). A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on human clinical trials that met specific inclusion criteria. Results: Prevailing findings show that AHSCT provides the most consistent benefit, achieving long-term immune reconstitution and remission in patients with highly active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), although it carries procedural risks. MSC therapies have demonstrated good safety and biological activity, especially when delivered intrathecally (IT) in progressive MS, though clinical results remain variable. Conclusions: NSC-based treatments are stil

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.