The cell yields and biological characteristics of stromal/stem cells from lipoaspirate with different digestion loading ratio.
Li Z., Mu D., Liu C., Xin M., Fu S., Li S.
Laboratory Study, published in Cytotechnology (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Cytotechnology (2020)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 31993890
- PMCID
- PMC7193004
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10616-020-00369-9
- Citations
- 7
Abstract (original English)
Effective harvesting procedure for adipose tissue is demanded by the affordable Good Manufacturing Practice-Compliant Production of clinical-grade adipose tissue-derived stem cells (hADSCs). Enzymatic digestion using collagenase is the most reliable method of adipose tissue-derived stem cells (hADSCs) isolation, while the optimized loading volume ratios of digestion to container during the shaking process of adipose tissue and collagenase mixture are still lacking. This study was conducted to determine the optimized loading volume ratio (mixture to container) for enzymatic digestion of Stromal/Stem Cells from lipoaspirate. Lipoaspirates were obtained from twelve women immediately after liposuction. Then tissue from each patient was divided into four groups according to different loading volume ratios in 50 ml centrifugal tube: 0.2 group, 0.4 group, 0.6 group, 0.8 group. Stromal vascular fractions (SVF) were obtained from each group, then total cell counts, viability and viable cell count were performed. hADSCs were harvested at passage (P) 2, whose morphologies, immunophenotypes, proliferation, and tri-differentiation abilities were compared. 0.4 loading volume ratio provided the highest cell yield, favorable viability and viable cell yield. The proliferation and triple differentiation ability of hADSCs obtained by 0.4 group was not inferior to that of other groups. Therefore,
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.