Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Challenges and Advances in Peripheral Nerve Tissue Engineering Critical Factors Affecting Nerve Regeneration

Fakhr MJ., Kavakebian F., Ababzadeh S., Rezapour A.

Narrative Review, published in J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40225756
PMCID
PMC11918807
DOI
10.1155/2024/8868411
Citations
8

Abstract (original English)

Peripheral neuropathy is painful and can cause a considerable decline in quality of life. Surgery and autograft are the current approaches and clinical standards for restoring function after nerve damage. However, they usually result in unacceptable clinical results, so we need modern peripheral nerve defect treatment approaches. Tissue engineering techniques have been developed as a promising approach, but there are some considerations for translational application. Clinical application of novel tissue engineering methods is related to combining the appropriate cell and scaffold type to introduce safe and efficient bioscaffolds. Efficient nerve regeneration occurs by mimicking the extracellular matrix and combining topographical, biochemical, mechanical, and conductive signs via different cells, biomolecules, and polymers. In brief, ideal engineered biomaterial scaffolds will have to cover all characteristics of nerve tissue, such as nerve number, myelin, and axon thickness. Nerve regeneration has a highly sensitive response to its surrounding microenvironment. For designing a suitable construct, matching the regenerative potential of the autograft as the golden standard is essential. This review article examines the newest advancements in peripheral nerve tissue engineering. Specifically, the discussion will focus on incorporating innovative cues, biological modification, bio

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Peripheral NervesAnimalsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsTissue EngineeringNerve RegenerationTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.