The characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells: a stem cell is not a stem cell is not a stem cell.
Khan WS., Hardingham TE.
Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in J Stem Cells (2012) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- J Stem Cells (2012)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 23550347
Abstract (original English)
There has been an increasing interest in stem cell applications and tissue engineering approaches in surgical practice to deal with damaged or lost tissue. Although there have been developments in almost all surgical disciplines, the greatest advances are being made in orthopaedics. This is due to many factors including the familiarity with bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Unfortunately significant hurdles remain to be overcome in many areas before tissue engineering becomes more routinely used in clinical practice. Stem cells have been identified in a number of adult tissues, albeit in small numbers. In addition to bone marrow, mesenchymal stem cells have been identified in a number of tissues including adipose tissue and fat pad. The mesenchymal stem cells are generally isolated from the tissue and expanded in culture. These cells are characterised or defined using a set of cell surface markers; mesenchymal stem cells are generally positive for CD44, CD90 and CD105, and are negative for haematopoetic markers CD34 and CD45, and the neurogenic marker CD56. In this paper the characterisation of stem cells is discussed followed by preliminary evidence suggesting that pericytes may be a candidate stem cell.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Oncologic safety of autologous fat grafting in head and neck cancer patients: A scoping review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 116 on Face & Skin, published in Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 116
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell-derived exosomes in tissue regeneration of oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Medicine (Baltimore) - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stromal Vascular Fraction-Assisted Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Meta-analysis on Face & Skin, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Aesthetic Plast Surg - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Applications of Exosomes in Female Medicine: A Systematic Review of Molecular Biology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, Systemic / IV, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
The use of cellular therapies for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review of behavioral and molecular outcomes.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 8 on Neuroinflammation, published in Neurosurg Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 8
Neurosurg Rev - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Osteogenic and Biocompatibility Potential of Polylactic Acid-Based Materials: A Systematic Review of Human Primary Cells Studies
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, published in J Funct Biomater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Funct Biomater