Characterisation of mesenchymal stromal cells in clinical trial reports: analysis of published descriptors
Wilson AJ., Rand E., Webster AJ., Genever PG.
Clinical Trial on Face & Skin, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Stem Cell Res Ther (2021)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 34158116
- PMCID
- PMC8220718
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13287-021-02435-1
- Citations
- 42
Abstract (original English)
Background Mesenchymal stem or stromal cells are the most widely used cell therapy to date. They are heterogeneous, with variations in growth potential, differentiation capacity and protein expression profile depending on tissue source and production process. Nomenclature and defining characteristics have been debated for almost 20 years, yet the generic term 'MSC' is used to cover a wide range of cellular phenotypes. Against a documented lack of definition of cellular populations used in clinical trials, our study evaluated the extent of characterisation of the cellular population or study drug. Methods A literature search of clinical trials involving mesenchymal stem/stromal cells was refined to 84 papers upon application of pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data were extracted covering background trial information including location, phase, indication, tissue source and details of clinical cell population characterisation (expression of surface markers, viability, differentiation assays and potency/functionality assays). Descriptive statistics were applied, and tests of association between groups were explored using Fisher's exact test for count data with simulated p value. Results Twenty-eight studies (33.3%) include no characterisation data. Forty-five (53.6%) reported average values per marker for all cell lots used in the trial, and 11 (13.1%) studies included in
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Oncologic safety of autologous fat grafting in head and neck cancer patients: A scoping review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 116 on Face & Skin, published in Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 116
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell-derived exosomes in tissue regeneration of oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Medicine (Baltimore) - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stromal Vascular Fraction-Assisted Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Meta-analysis on Face & Skin, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Aesthetic Plast Surg - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Applications of Exosomes in Female Medicine: A Systematic Review of Molecular Biology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, Systemic / IV, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
The use of cellular therapies for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review of behavioral and molecular outcomes.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 8 on Neuroinflammation, published in Neurosurg Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 8
Neurosurg Rev - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Osteogenic and Biocompatibility Potential of Polylactic Acid-Based Materials: A Systematic Review of Human Primary Cells Studies
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, published in J Funct Biomater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Funct Biomater