Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Characterization of cell signaling, morphology, and differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells based on cell adhesion mechanism.

Kang JM., Rajangam T., Rhie JW., Kim SH.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in J Cell Physiol (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Cell Physiol (2020)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
32017071
DOI
10.1002/jcp.29587
Citations
13

Abstract (original English)

It is essential to characterize the cellular properties of mesenchymal stem cell populations to maintain quality specifications and control in regenerative medicine. Biofunctional materials have been designed as artificial matrices for the stimulation of cell adhesion and specific cellular functions. We have developed recombinant maltose-binding protein (MBP)-fused proteins as artificial adhesion matrices to control human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) fate by using an integrin-independent heparin sulfate proteoglycans-mediated cell adhesion. In this study, we characterize cell adhesion-dependent cellular behaviors of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) and human bone marrow stem cells (hBMSCs). We used an MBP-fused basic fibroblast growth factor (MF)-coated surface and fibronectin (FN)-coated surface to restrict and support, respectively, integrin-mediated adhesion. The cells adhered to MF exhibited restricted actin cytoskeleton organization and focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation. The hASCs and hBMSCs exhibited different cytoplasmic projection morphologies on MF. Both hASCs and hBMSCs differentiated more dominantly into osteogenic cells on FN than on MF. In contrast, hASCs differentiated more dominantly into adipogenic cells on MF than on FN, whereas hBMSCs differentiated predominantly into adipogenic cells on FN. The results indicate that hASCs exhibit a competitive dif

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Actin CytoskeletonAdipocytesAdipogenesisAdipose TissueCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedFibroblast Growth FactorsFibronectinsFocal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research