Characterization of the human nucleus pulposus cell phenotype and evaluation of novel marker gene expression to define adult stem cell differentiation.
Minogue BM., Richardson SM., Zeef LA., Freemont AJ., Hoyland JA.
Laboratory Study on Disc Degeneration, published in Arthritis Rheum (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Arthritis Rheum (2010)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 20722018
- DOI
- 10.1002/art.27710
Abstract (original English)
Development of stem cell therapies for regenerating the nucleus pulposus (NP) are hindered by the lack of specific markers by which to distinguish NP cells from articular chondrocytes (ACs). The purpose of this study was to define the phenotype profile of human NP cells using gene expression profiling and to assess whether the identified markers could distinguish mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation to a correct NP cell phenotype. Affymetrix MicroArray analyses were conducted on human NP cells and ACs, and differential expression levels for several positive (NP) and negative (AC) marker genes were validated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Novel marker gene and protein expression was also assessed in human bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) and adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) following differentiation in type I collagen gels. Analysis identified 12 NP-positive and 36-negative (AC) marker genes that were differentially expressed ≥20-fold, and for a subset of them (NP-positive genes PAX1, FOXF1, HBB, CA12, and OVOS2; AC-positive genes GDF10, CYTL1, IBSP, and FBLN1), differential expression was confirmed by real-time quantitative PCR. Differentiated BM-MSCs and AD-MSCs demonstrated significant increases in the novel NP markers PAX1 and FOXF1. AD-MSCs lacked expression of the AC markers IBSP and FBLN1, whereas BM-MSCs lacked expressio
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease: A systematic review of preclinical evidence, clinical translation, and future directions
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, published in N Am Spine Soc J (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
N Am Spine Soc J - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Lumbar Disc Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis on Disc Degeneration, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the Management of Stage III and IV Degenerative Disc Disease
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, Chronic Inflammation, published in Cureus (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Cureus1 citations - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 736 on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, published in Neurospine (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 736
Neurospine1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Sirtuins in intervertebral disc degeneration: current understanding
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, Chronic Inflammation, published in Mol Med (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
Mol Med11 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
A comprehensive review of cell transplantation and platelet-rich plasma therapy for the treatment of disc degeneration-related back and neck pain: A systematic evidence-based analysis
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, published in JOR Spine (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
JOR Spine22 citations