Charge injection based electrical stimulation on polypyrrole planar electrodes to regulate cellular osteogenic differentiation
Liu Z., Dong L., Cheng K., Luo Z., Weng W.
Laboratory Study, published in RSC Adv (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- RSC Adv (2018)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 35541122
- PMCID
- PMC9080618
- DOI
- 10.1039/c8ra02601g
- Citations
- 9
Abstract (original English)
In this study, polypyrrole (Ppy) electrodes were prepared to support an electrical stimulation to MC3T3-E1 cells for regulating their osteogenic differentiation. The charge injection capacity ( C Q ) of the Ppy electrodes could be adjusted by the Ppy thickness, and a higher C Q could make the electrode able to produce a higher charge injection quantity ( Q inj ) at applied voltage. The Q inj onto electrode could be considered as the intensity of the stimulation pulse to cells, and the pulse frequency means the number of electric stimulation with Q inj at one second. Hence, we conducted the present work in the view of Q inj . When the cells were electrically stimulated for 1 hour per day, the electrodes with Q inj ranged in 0.08-0.15 μQ had an obvious role in enhancing cellular osteogenic differentiation whereas Q inj of lower than 0.03 μQ or more than 0.30 μQ gave the stimulations with no or negative effects. And the stimulation with 1 or 25 Hz showed to enhance the differentiation, whereas the stimulation with 50 Hz gave an inhibiting effect. We further found the osteogenic differentiation potential triggered by electrical simulation was related to cell growth stage, and the stimulation carried out at early stage (day 2-5) during 8 days cell culture showed more contribution to enhancing osteogenic differentiation than that at later stage (day 6-8). It is proposed that the desi
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.