Chemical transdifferentiation of somatic cells to neural cells: a systematic review

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Transdifferentiation is the conversion of a specific somatic cell into another cell type, bypassing a transient pluripotent state. This implies a faster method to generate cells of interest with the additional benefit of reduced tumorigenic risk for clinical use. Objective We describe protocols that use small molecules as direct conversion inducers, without the need for exogenous factors, to evaluate the potential of cell transdifferentiation for pharmacological and clinical applications. Methods In this systematic review, using PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a personalized search strategy in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web Of Science), looking for experimental works that used exclusively small molecules for transdifferentiation of non-neural cell types into neural lineage cells. Results We explored the main biological mechanisms involved in direct cell conversion induced by different small molecules used in 33 experimental in vitro and in vitro transdifferentiation protocols. We also summarize the main characteristics of these protocols, such as the chemical cocktails used, time for transdifferentiation, and conversion efficiency. Conclusion Small molecules-based protocols for neuronal transdifferentiation are reasonably safe, economical, accessible, and are a promising alternative for future use in regenerative medicine and pharmacology.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.