Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Cancer: The Role of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Key Resistance Genes.

Parvaneh S., Miklós V., Páhi ZG., Szűcs D., Monostori T., Póliska S.

Laboratory Study, published in Int J Mol Sci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2025)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39796244
PMCID
PMC11720846
DOI
10.3390/ijms26010390
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Drug resistance is a significant challenge in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), where stromal elements such as adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) contribute to a chemoresistant tumor microenvironment (TME). This study explored the effects of oxaliplatin (OXP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on PDAC cells (Capan-1) and ASCs to investigate the mechanisms of chemoresistance. While OXP and 5-FU reduced Capan-1 viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner, ASCs demonstrated high resistance, maintaining > 90% viability even at cytotoxic doses. Transcriptomic analyses revealed OXP-induced transcriptional reprogramming in ASCs, with over 7000 differentially expressed genes, highlighting the pathways related to DNA damage response, cell cycle regulation, and stress-related signaling. In contrast, 5-FU elicited limited transcriptional changes, affecting only 192 genes. Cytokine proteome profiling revealed that OXP-treated ASCs significantly influenced the tumor microenvironment by promoting immune evasion (via IL-4, GM-CSF, IP-10, and GROα) and driving extracellular matrix remodeling (through EMMPRIN and DPPIV). In contrast, 5-FU induced comparatively weaker effects, primarily limited to hypoxia-related pathways. Although OXP reduced angiogenic factors, it paradoxically activated pro-survival pathways, thereby enhancing ASC-mediated tumor support. These findings underscore

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansMesenchymal Stem CellsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmPancreatic NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorTumor MicroenvironmentFluorouracilOxaliplatinAdipose TissueGene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.