Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Chondrogenic potential of mesenchymal progenitors from somatic and cartilage-derived iPSCs is predicted by their transcriptomic signatures.

Khan NM., Doan TN., Kaiser JM., Drissi H.

Laboratory Study on Cartilage Damage, published in Genes Dis (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Genes Dis (2025)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41492477
PMCID
PMC12765249
DOI
10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101730

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely used in regenerative therapy but face limitations like low abundance, replicative senescence, donor variability, and restricted plasticity. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived MSCs (iMSCs) may provide an alternative, but their similarities or intrinsic differences with adult MSCs remain unknown. This study compares the chondrogenic potential of iMSCs derived from chondrocyte-specific induced pluripotent stem cells, with bone marrow-derived MSCs, adipose-derived stem cells, and dedifferentiated chondrocytes. Chondrogenic differentiation was performed in high-density pellet cultures with short-term or long-term TGFβ3 treatment. Chondrogenic gene arrays, gene regulatory networks, and gene ontology analysis revealed divergent signaling pathways. Bulk RNA sequencing was performed to characterize the transcriptomic profiles of each MSC. Results showed that iMSCs produced cartilage with hyaline-like features and minimal hypertrophy, distinguishing them phenotypically from adult MSCs. Gene regulatory network analyses identified EGF, FGFR, FLT1, and HIFA as iMSC hub genes for chondrogenic differentiation. Molecular signaling analysis unveiled that TGFβ3 induced SMAD2/3, not SMAD1/5, suppressing hypertrophy in iMSC chondrogenesis. RNA sequencing highlighted cell-specific differences, functional heterogeneity, and divergent cell signaling profile

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research