Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Chondroitinase ABC in spinal cord injury: advances in delivery strategies and therapeutic synergies

Cunha RS., Rossi EA., de Santana TA., Costa-Ferro ZSM., Souza BSF.

Narrative Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Scar, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40552113
PMCID
PMC12183185
DOI
10.3389/fbioe.2025.1604502
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition that leads to permanent neurological deficits due to the formation of a glial scar and the accumulation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), which inhibit axonal regeneration. Chondroitinase ABC (ChABC), a bacterial enzyme capable of degrading CSPGs, has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for enhancing neural plasticity and functional recovery after SCI. However, clinical translation remains challenging due to the enzyme's thermal instability, short half-life, and limited penetration into the lesion site. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies for ChABC delivery, including direct infusion, nanoparticles, hydrogels, scaffolds, viral vectors, and stem cell-based approaches. We highlight recent technological advances that improve enzyme stability, targeting, and sustained release, as well as combinatorial therapies that enhance tissue regeneration. Although ChABC monotherapy has shown limited efficacy, its association with other regenerative approaches has demonstrated significant potential in preclinical models. Finally, we discuss the translational challenges and future directions required to bring ChABC-based therapies closer to clinical application in SCI patients.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research