circFOXP1: a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target in human diseases
Yi Q., Ouyang X., Zhong K., Chen Z., Zhu W., Zhu G.
Narrative Review, published in Front Immunol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Front Immunol (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39606233
- PMCID
- PMC11599189
- DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1489378
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Circular RNA (circRNA) are a unique class of non-coding RNAs characterized by their covalently closed loop structures, which grant them properties such as stability and conservation. Among these, circFOXP1 has been implicated in various diseases, including cancers, respiratory, skeletal, and cardiovascular disorders. This review systematically examines circFOXP1's role in disease progression, highlighting its involvement in critical biological processes, including cell proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, and autophagy. Mechanistically, circFOXP1 functions through miRNA sponging, protein interactions, and modulation of key signaling pathways such as Wnt and PI3K/AKT. We discuss its potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic target. Our analysis also identifies key unresolved questions, such as the precise regulatory networks involving circFOXP1 and its translation potential, offering pathways for future research.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.