Click Chemistry-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering
Sojdeh S., Panjipour A., Yaghmour A., Arabpour Z., Djalilian AR.
Narrative Review, published in Gels (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Gels (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41002498
- PMCID
- PMC12469877
- DOI
- 10.3390/gels11090724
- Citations
- 7
Abstract (original English)
Click chemistry has become a powerful and flexible approach for designing hydrogels used in tissue engineering thanks to its high specificity, fast reaction rates, and compatibility with biological systems. In this review, we introduce the core principles of click chemistry, including efficiency, orthogonality, and modularity, and highlight the main types of reactions commonly used in hydrogel formation, such as azide-alkyne c-cloadditions, thiol-ene/yne reactions, Diels-Alder cycloadditions, and tetrazine-norbornene couplings. These chemistries allow researchers to create covalently crosslinked hydrogels that are injectable, responsive to environmental stimuli, biodegradable, or multifunctional. We also explore strategies to enhance bioactivity, such as incorporating peptides, growth factors, or extracellular matrix components, and enabling precise spatial and temporal control over biological cues. Click-based hydrogels have shown promise across a wide range of tissue engineering applications, from cartilage and skin repair to neural regeneration, corneal healing, and cardiovascular scaffolds, as well as in 3D bioprinting technologies. Despite the many advantages of click chemistry such as mild reaction conditions and customizable material properties, some challenges remain, including concerns around copper toxicity, the cost of specialized reagents, and scalability. Finally,
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.