Clinical Applications of Corneal Cells Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Luan Y., Musayeva A., Kim J., Le Blon D., van den Bogerd B., Dickman MM.
Clinical Trial, published in Biomolecules (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Biomolecules (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40867584
- PMCID
- PMC12383976
- DOI
- 10.3390/biom15081139
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Corneal diseases are among the leading causes of blindness worldwide and the standard treatment is the transplantation of corneal donor tissue. Treatment for cornea-related visual impairment and blindness is, however, often constrained by the global shortage of suitable donor grafts. To alleviate the shortage of corneal donor tissue, new treatment options have been explored in the last decade. The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which has revolutionized regenerative medicine, offers immense potential for corneal repair and regeneration. Using iPSCs can provide a renewable source for generating various corneal cell types, including corneal epithelial cells, stromal keratocytes, and corneal endothelial cells. To document the recent progress towards the clinical application of iPSC-derived corneal cells, this review summarizes the latest advancements in iPSC-derived corneal cell therapies, ranging from differentiation protocols and preclinical studies to the first clinical trials, and discusses the challenges for successful translation to the clinic.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.