Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Clinical implications of differential functional capacity between tissue-specific human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells.

Yen BL., Liu KJ., Sytwu HK., Yen ML.

Clinical Trial on Scar, Immune Modulation, published in FEBS J (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
FEBS J (2022)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35303395
DOI
10.1111/febs.16438

Abstract (original English)

Over the past two decades, there has been an explosion in the numbers of clinical trials using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). While the safety profile of MSC therapy has been excellent, therapeutic success has not been as robust as expected. In addition to variabilities inherent in all live-cell products because of donor-specific differences and manufacturing practices, MSCs may have an additional layer of complexity due to the availability of many tissues/organ sources for isolation. Since first isolation from the bone marrow (BM) over 50 years ago, human MSCs have been robustly found in multiple tissues/organs. The increased variety of MSC sources is reflected in clinical trials: while BMMSCs was used in nearly all trials prior to 2008, they are used in less than 50% of clinical trials in recent years. While the majority of single-source MSC preclinical data accumulated over the past several decades do reveal biological differences between tissue-specific sources of MSCs, studies directly comparing different MSC sources are relatively rare. In this Review, we summarise these past findings and also specifically focus on studies comparing MSCs isolated from the most commonly utilised sources of BM, adipose tissue and post-partum discarded extraembryonic tissue. The MSC functions discussed here include paraxial mesodermal trilineage differentiation capacity, and also other well-

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansCell DifferentiationAdipose TissueBone MarrowStem CellsBone Marrow CellsCells, CulturedCell Proliferation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research