Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

A Closed-system Technology for Mechanical Isolation of High Quantities of Stromal Vascular Fraction from Fat for Immediate Clinical Use.

Solodeev I., Meilik B., Gur E., Shani N.

Laboratory Study with a reported sample of 30, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2023)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
30
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37361510
PMCID
PMC10287119
DOI
10.1097/GOX.0000000000005096
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

Adipose tissue stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is increasingly used in the clinic. SVF separation from fat by enzymatic disruption is currently the gold standard for SVF isolation. However, enzymatic SVF isolation is time-consuming (~1.5 h), costly and significantly increases the regulatory burden of SVF isolation. Mechanical fat disruption is rapid, cheaper, and less regulatory challenging. However, its reported efficacy is insufficient for clinical use. The current study evaluated the efficacy of a novel rotating blades (RBs) mechanical SVF isolation system. Methods SVF cells were isolated from the same lipoaspirate sample (n = 30) by enzymatic isolation, massive shaking (wash), or engine-induced RBs mechanical isolation. SVF cells were counted, characterized by flow cytometry and by their ability to form adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs). Results The RBs mechanical approach yielded 2 × 10 5 SVF nucleated cells/mL fat, inferior to enzymatic isolation (4.17 × 10 5 ) but superior to cells isolating from fat by the "wash" technique (0.67 × 10 5 ). Importantly, RBs SVF isolation yield was similar to reported yields achieved via clinical-grade enzymatic SVF isolation. RBs-isolated SVF cells were found to contain 22.7% CD45 - CD31 - CD34 + stem cell progenitor cells (n = 5) yielding quantities of multipotent ASCs similar to enzymatic controls. Conclusions The RBs isolation techn

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.