Co-culture of pro-inflammatory macrophages and myofibroblasts: Evaluating morphological phenotypes and screening the effects of signaling pathway inhibitors
Venter C., Myburgh KH., Niesler CU.
Animal Study, published in Physiol Rep (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Physiol Rep (2021)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 33463904
- PMCID
- PMC7814483
- DOI
- 10.14814/phy2.14704
- Citations
- 9
Abstract (original English)
Skeletal muscle regeneration is a complex process influenced by non-myogenic macrophages and fibroblasts, which acquire different phenotypes in response to changes in the injury milieu or changes in experimental conditions. In vitro, serum stimulates the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulates the polarization of unstimulated (M0) macrophages to acquire an M1 pro-inflammatory phenotype. We characterized these phenotypes using morphology (with circularity as shape descriptor; perfect circularity = 1.0) and phenotype-specific markers. Myofibroblasts (high α-smooth muscle actin [SMA] expression) had high circularity (mean 0.60 ± 0.03). Their de-differentiation to fibroblasts (low α-SMA expression) significantly lessened circularity (0.47 ± 0.01 and 0.35 ± 0.02 in 2% or 0% serum culture media respectively (p < 0.05). Unstimulated (M0) macrophages (no CD86 expression) had high circularity (0.72 ± 0.02) which decreased when stimulated to M1 macrophages (CD86 expression) (LPS; 0.61 ± 0.02; p < 0.05). Utilizing these established conditions, we then co-cultured M1 macrophages with myofibroblasts or myoblasts. M1 macrophages significantly decreased relative myofibroblast numbers (from 223 ± 22% to 64 ± 7%), but not myoblast numbers. This pro-inflammatory co-culture model was used to rapidly screen the following four compounds for abil
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.