Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Combined Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Protect the Brain From Brain Death-Induced Injury in Rat.

Chen KH., Hsiao HY., Glenn Wallace C., Lin KC., Li YC., Huang TH.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, Systemic / IV, published in J Neuropathol Exp Neurol (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol (2019)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30481326
DOI
10.1093/jnen/nly108
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

This study tested the hypothesis that combined adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADMSC) and low-energy extracorporeal shock wave (ECSW) therapy could protect brain from brain death (BD)-induced injury. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats were categorized into group 1 (sham control), group 2 (BD), group 3 (BD + ECSW [0.15 mJ/mm2/300 impulses] applied to the skull surface 3 hours after BD induction), group 4 (BD + ADMSC [1.2 × 106 cell] by intravenous injection 3 hours after BD induction) and group 5 (BD + ECSW + ADMSC). By 6 hours after BD induction, circulating/spleen levels of immune cells (CD3/CD4+, CD8/CD4+, Treg+) and circulating levels of inflammatory cells (MPO/Ly6G/CD11a/b) and soluble mediators (TNF-α/IL-6) were lowest in group 1 and significantly progressively reduced from groups 2 to 5 (all p < 0.0001). Brain protein expressions of inflammatory (TNF-α/NF-κB/MMP-9/IL-1β), apoptotic (caspase-3/PARP/mitochondrial-BAX), oxidative stress/DNA-damage (NOX-1/NOX-2/oxidized protein/γ-H2AX) biomarkers exhibited an identical pattern, whereas anti-oxidant (SIRT1/SIRT3) and mitochondrial-integrity (mitochondrial-cytochrome-C) biomarkers exhibited an opposite pattern to inflammatory biomarkers among the 5 groups (all p < 0.0001). The cellular expressions of inflammatory/brain-edema (F4/80/CD14+/GFAP/AQP4) biomarkers exhibited an identical pattern to inflammation among the 5 groups

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBrain DeathBrain InjuriesExtracorporeal Shockwave TherapyMaleMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research