Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Combined Transplantation of Mesenchymal Progenitor and Neural Stem Cells to Repair Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

White SV., Ma YHE., Plant CD., Harvey AR., Plant GW.

Animal Study on Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Inflammation, published in Cells (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Cells (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40358154
PMCID
PMC12072178
DOI
10.3390/cells14090630
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPC) are effective in reducing tissue loss, preserving white matter, and improving forelimb function after a spinal cord injury (SCI). We proposed that by preconditioning the mouse by the intravenous delivery (IV) of MPCs for 24 h following SCI, this would provide a more favorable tissue milieu for an NSC intraspinal bridging transplantation at day three and day seven. In combination, these transplants will provide better anatomical and functional outcomes. The intravenous MSCs would provide cell protection and reduce inflammation. NSCs would provide a tissue bridge for axonal regeneration and myelination and reconnect long tract spinal pathways. Results showed that initial protection of the injury site by IV MPCs transplantation resulted in no increased survival of the NSCs transplanted at day seven. However, integration of transplanted NSCs was increased at the day three timepoint, indicating MPCs influence very early immune signaling. We show, in this study, that MPC transplantation resulted in a co-operative NSC cell survival improvement on day three post-SCI. In addition to increased NSC survival on day three, there was an increase in NSC-derived mature oligodendrocytes at this early timepoint. An in vitro analysis confirmed MPC-driven oligodendrocyte differentiation, which was statistically increased when compared to control NSC-only cultures

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
OligodendrogliaMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsMice, Inbred C57BLMiceSpinal Cord InjuriesMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationCell DifferentiationCell SurvivalFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research