Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCohort StudyPubMed

Comparative Analysis of Adipose Tissue Depots in Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction.

Pinho C., Soares B., Costa B., Teixeira D., Salazar MJ., Neto FL.

Cohort Study with a reported sample of 24 on Scar, published in Arch Med Res (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Cohort Study
Journal
Arch Med Res (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
24
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41442999
DOI
10.1016/j.arcmed.2025.103360
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Background Mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction is the standard treatment for breast cancer. Choosing autologous tissue requires an in-depth understanding of the molecular and structural characteristics of the different adipose tissue depots. Method White adipose tissue (WAT) from five different locations (above and below the abdominal Scarpa's fascia, thighs, breast skin envelope, and omentum) was collected from 24 patients undergoing breast reconstruction and grouped based on immediate (IBR) or delayed (DBR) reconstruction. The adipocyte area was analyzed in histologically processed WAT sections. Transcription and protein expression profiles, related to inflammation, fibrosis, browning, and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) content were determined by RT-qPCR and Western blotting. Results Compared to IBR, omental WAT from DBR patients exhibits larger adipocytes, and higher expression of TIMP1, FN1, CD206, and CD45, as well as lower levels of CIDEA. Breast fat also differs between the two groups, with lower levels of IL6 and CIDEA, and overexpression of FN1 in the DBR group. Within the IBR group, breast fat shows higher levels of IL6, TIMP1 and CIDEA, but lower expression of FN1 and COL3A1 than subcutaneous WAT. Conclusion Omental fat in the IBR cohort has properties similar to those of subcutaneous WAT, indicating that the omentum is a promising candidate for rapid br

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansFemaleMammaplastyBreast NeoplasmsMiddle AgedAdipose Tissue, WhiteAdultMastectomyOmentumAdipose Tissue

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research