Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Comparative Analysis of Electron Microscopy Techniques for Hydrogel Microarchitecture Characterization: SEM, Cryo-SEM, ESEM, and TEM

Aigoin J., Payré B., Minvielle Moncla J., Escudero M., Goudouneche D., Ferri-Angulo D.

Laboratory Study, published in ACS Omega (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
ACS Omega (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40290944
PMCID
PMC12019757
DOI
10.1021/acsomega.4c08096
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

Hydrogels have emerged as a versatile class of materials with broad applications in biomedical engineering, drug delivery, and tissue engineering. Understanding their intricate structures and morphologies is crucial for tailoring their properties to meet specific biomedical needs. It has been clearly established that the composition and microarchitecture of the materials play a critical role in essential cellular mechanisms such as mechanosensing, adhesion, and remodeling. This question is essential in tissue engineering, where precisely characterizing the microarchitecture of the materials used to model the cell microenvironment is a critical step to ensure the reproducibility and relevance of reconstructed tissues. In this study, we present a comprehensive comparison of four advanced electron microscopy techniques, namely, scanning electron microscopy, cryo-scanning electron microscopy, environmental scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy, to observe the hydrogel microarchitecture, including a comparison of the sample preparation methods for each technique. Each technique's specific advantages and limitations are discussed in detail, highlighting their unique capabilities in characterizing the hydrogel structures. We illustrate this study with two semisynthetic hydrogels, such as gelatin methacrylate and hyaluronic acid methacrylate. Moreover, we d

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.