Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Comparative characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells derived from reamer-irrigator-aspirator, iliac crest bone marrow, and adipose tissue.

Toosi S., Naderi-Meshkin H., Kalalinia F., Peivandi MT., Hossein Khani H., Bahrami AR.

Laboratory Study, published in Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) (2016)
Country
France
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
27609477

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been considered promising tools for new clinical concepts in supporting cellular therapy and regenerative medicine. More recently, Ream/Irrigator/Aspirator (RIA) was introduced as a source of MSCs. In this study we compared MSCs derived from three different sources (iliac crest bone marrow (ICBM), adipose tissue (AT), and (RIA)) regarding the morphology, the success rate of isolating MSCs, colony frequency, expansion potential, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation capacity. MSCs were isolated from three different sources and flow cytometric analyses were performed for cell characterization. Colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) assay and population doubling time (PDT) were evaluated for MSCs derived from three different sources and differentiation potential of RIA, ICBM-, and AT-MSCs were determined by staining. Additionally, gene expression profiles for tissue specific markers corresponding to osteogenesis and chondrogenesis were analyzed using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Cultured with the appropriate condition, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation could be confirmed in all MSC preparations. Flow cytometry analysis indicated that RIA- and AT-derived MSCs have more homogenous populations than ICBM-MSCs. A comparison of the colonogenic ability in different tissues by CFU-F assay after 10 days showed that more co

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueBiomarkersBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell MembraneCellular SenescenceChondrocytesChondrogenesisClone Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.