Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Comparative characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood.

Wagner W., Wein F., Seckinger A., Frankhauser M., Wirkner U., Krause U.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Exp Hematol (2005) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Exp Hematol (2005)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
16263424
DOI
10.1016/j.exphem.2005.07.003

Abstract (original English)

Various preparative protocols have been proposed for the acquisition and cultivation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). Whereas surface antigen markers have failed to precisely define this population, microarray analysis might provide a better tool for characterization of MSC. In this study, we have analyzed global gene expression profiles of human MSC isolated from adipose tissue (AT), from umbilical cord blood (CB), and from bone marrow (BM) under two growth conditions and have compared them to terminally differentiated human fibroblasts (HS68). Profiles were compared using our Human Genome Microarray representing 51.144 different cDNA clones. Cultured with the appropriate conditions, osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation could be confirmed in all MSC preparations but not in fibroblasts. No phenotypic differences were observed by flow cytometry using a panel of 22 surface antigen markers. Whereas MSC derived from different donors using the same culture procedure yielded a consistent and reproducible gene expression profile, many genes were differentially expressed in MSC from different ontogenetic sources or from different culture conditions. Twenty-five genes were overlapping and upregulated in all MSC preparations from AT, CB, and BM as compared to HS68 fibroblasts. These genes included fibronectin, ECM2, glypican-4, ID1, NF1B, HOXA5, and HOXB6. Many genes upregulated in

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueBone Marrow CellsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineageFetal BloodFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunophenotyping

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research