Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparative Characterization of Human and Equine Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Basis for Translational Studies in the Equine Model.

Hillmann A., Ahrberg AB., Brehm W., Heller S., Josten C., Paebst F.

Animal Study on Tendon Injury, published in Cell Transplant (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Cell Transplant (2015)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
25853993
DOI
10.3727/096368915X687822

Abstract (original English)

Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have gained tremendous attention as potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of orthopedic diseases. Promising results have been obtained after application of MSCs for treatment of tendon and joint disease in the equine model, making it appear favorable to use these results as a basis for the translational process of the therapy. However, while the horse is considered a highly suitable model for orthopedic diseases, knowledge is lacking regarding the level of analogy of equine MSCs and their human counterparts. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the properties of human and equine adipose- and tendon-derived MSCs in a direct comparison. Basic properties of human and equine MSCs from both tissues were similar. The cells expressed CD29, CD44, CD90, and CD105 and lacked expression of CD73, CD14, CD34, CD45, CD79α, and MCHII/HLA-DR. No significant differences were found between proliferation potential of human and equine MSCs in early passages, but recovery of nucleated cells after tissue digestion as well as proliferation in later passages was higher in equine samples (p < 0.01). All samples showed a good migration capacity and multilineage differentiation potential. However, while osteogenic differentiation was achieved in all equine samples, it was only evident in five out of nine human tendon-derived samples. Human M

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdultAnimalsBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell MovementCell ProliferationFemaleHorsesHumans

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research