Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Comparative Histological Study of Therapeutic Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells versus Mesenchymal Stem Cells Co-Cultured with Liver Tissue on Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Adult Male Albino Rats

Salem BA., ElKaliny HH., El-Hafez AAAA., Sarhan NI.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in J Microsc Ultrastruct (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Microsc Ultrastruct (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
38213650
PMCID
PMC10779448
DOI
10.4103/jmau.jmau_62_21

Abstract (original English)

Context Liver diseases are major causes of morbidity and mortality. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic effects, so they can be used in the treatment of liver diseases. MSCs co-cultured with diseased liver tissue improve the homing capacity, survival rate, and paracrine effects of the MSCs, as well as the ability to enhance liver function. Aims This work aimed to study the therapeutic effect of MSCs versus MSCs co-cultured with liver tissue on carbon tetrachloride (CCl 4 )-induced hepatotoxicity in adult male albino rats. Settings and design Twenty adult male albino rats were divided into four equal groups; Group I (control group), Group II received CCl 4 intraperitoneally (i.p.), Group III received CCl 4 i.p. and then injected with MSCs intravenously (i.v.), and Group IV received CCl 4 i.p. and then injected with co-cultured MSCs i.v. Materials and methods Finally, liver specimens were processed for light microscopy (LM) and electron microscopy (EM). Statistical analysis was carried out to assess histological scoring, area percentage of collagen fibers, number of glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive cells, and biochemical analysis of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase. Statistical analysis used Statistical analysis of (histological scoring, area % of collagen fibers, and biochemical analysis) was don

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research